Top Doctor
Top Doctor
Top Doctor
Verified
Contributor
The “feel test” used to be about how a top fit when you tried it on. Now the questions are smarter: How does an implant move on a jog? Does it feel natural in a sports bra? What about when you’re stretched out on the couch at 10 p.m.? Patients want answers about motion, soft-tissue health, and how things hold up in five years, not just five weeks. That’s the right way to choose an implant, and it’s the lens we’re using here.
Below, we compare Motiva implants with classic “gummy bear” (form-stable cohesive gel) options in plain English: what they feel like, how they move, and where they shine. We’ll also talk about pocket planning, because placement matters as much as the device. Subfascial placement and tissue-preserving techniques like Preservé™ can change comfort, reduce animation, and support long-term shape. No fluff, just the details you actually need.
Motiva implants are smooth-surface silicone gel implants built to feel soft and move with your body. Within the line, Motiva Ergonomix® is formulated to drape more naturally when upright and round out when you lie down. Motiva Round holds more upper-pole projection for patients who want a perkier profile. Patients often pair Motiva with subfascial pocketing (beneath the thin fascia on top of the pectoralis) and, in select practices, with Preservé™, a breast enhancement technique focused on preserving natural tissue support, sensation, and muscle.
“Gummy bear” implants are form-stable cohesive gel devices. They tend to keep a set shape, often teardrop/anatomic, regardless of position. Historically, many of these were paired with textured shells to reduce rotation risk. The key idea is structure: a firmer gel that can hold upper-pole shape and resist visible wrinkling in select anatomies.
Think of it this way: Motiva aims for dynamic softness and lifelike movement; cohesive “gummy” aims for set shape and structure.
Patients notice three things right away:
Motiva Ergonomix® leans into a “follows-you” look. Upright, it settles into a more teardrop-like silhouette. Supine, it rounds. That “shape shift” is closer to natural tissue behavior and reads soft in photos and in person.
Form-stable cohesive (gummy bear) is about a fixed silhouette. If you want reliable upper-pole structure regardless of position, this can be a match, especially in patients with looser skin who want a built-in scaffold. The tradeoff is feel; firmer gels don’t compress like a softer implant when hugged.
Patients who’ve experienced post-pregnancy deflation or weight cycling often split: some want soft, lifelike movement; others want that held-up upper pole. Good consults sort out which matters more to you.
There’s a lot of chatter online about smooth vs. textured. You’ll hear that textures were used historically to reduce rotation in anatomic shapes, and you’ll see many surgeons favoring smooth devices across the board today. The bigger story for day-to-day comfort and long-term stability is pocket design.
That’s where Preservé™ comes in. Per the current allowed messaging, Preservé is a breast enhancement technique designed to preserve natural breast tissue, functionality, nipple sensation, and chest muscles. It’s less invasive, with a focus on maintaining inner support structures and creating a precise pocket for enhanced implant stability and smaller scars, often with minimal anesthesia and quicker recovery. When you preserve what the breast already uses for support, you can often achieve desired volume with smaller implants and more stable long-term shape.
Bottom line: how the implant is housed and supported matters as much as which implant you choose.
Preservé™ pairs well with subfascial planning because both prioritize the inner support you already have. That synergy is one reason you’ll hear more about subfascial in current conversations.
Most augmentations use an inframammary fold incision (hidden in the crease). Softer devices and precise pocketing can help keep incisions compact. Scar quality comes down to placement, closure, your skin type, and aftercare. Expect months, not weeks, for scars to mature from pink to pearly. Scar care, sunscreen, and time are your friends.
Silicone implants, Motiva or cohesive, benefit from periodic imaging (MRI or ultrasound) to monitor device integrity. Your surgeon will map out a schedule based on your age, anatomy, and the device you choose. Day to day, pay attention to any hardening, sudden asymmetry, or shape changes and loop your care team in early.
Active patients often prefer a subfascial Motiva approach to sidestep muscle animation and keep movement natural in a sports bra. Pocket stability still matters; that’s technique, not brand.
Post-pregnancy or weight-shift patients may want upper-pole restoration and a bit of lift. Sometimes that’s implant alone; other times it’s implant + lift or implant + micro-fat grafting to soften transitions. A form-stable device can help in looser tissues; Motiva can deliver a soft, lived-in look. Both can be right, on different bodies.
Thin frames sometimes benefit from submuscular coverage to hide edges. That’s where measurements, 3D imaging, and “try-on” sizers matter more than opinions online.
The long game is about your soft tissue as much as the device. Pregnancy, weight change, and time will keep doing their thing. Preserving support, via pocket design and tissue-respecting methods like Preservé™, can help maintain position and reduce issues such as bottoming out or visible rippling down the road. No implant stops aging; a smart plan ages with you.
Price varies with implant line, facility and anesthesia, the complexity of pocket work, and add-ons like a lift or minor fat grafting. Think in terms of value: getting the right device and the right pocket in one operation saves headaches later. Ask about recovery support too; things like hyperbaric oxygen therapy or tailored scar care can improve your early season of healing.
Question | Motiva (e.g., Ergonomix) | Gummy Bear (Form-Stable Cohesive) |
Day-to-day feel | Soft, compressible | Firmer, “held” |
Motion with gravity | Flows upright; rounds supine | Holds set shape |
Upper-pole structure | Natural slope; Round version adds perk | Built-in structure, even upright |
Active lifestyle | Often paired with subfascial to reduce animation | Structure is stable; pocket planning still key |
Thin frames | Good with the right plane; may use submuscular in very thin | Structure can mask some irregularities; coverage still matters |
Pocket synergy | Works well with Preservé™ and subfascial planning | Works with careful pockets; rotation prevention historically used textures |
This isn’t a quiz with one right answer. It’s a map that helps you and your surgeon choose the lane that fits your anatomy, goals, and lifestyle.
“Natural” splits into feel and motion. Motiva reads softer and more dynamic; cohesive implants hold structure. Try sizers and review upright vs. supine photos to see which matches your vision.
It can. Placing the device beneath the fascia (not under the pec) often reduces implant distortion during chest activation. Technique and your anatomy both matter.
Yes. Many patients combine an implant with a short-scar lift or small-volume fat grafts for upper-pole blending. The mix is tailored to your skin quality and goals.
Preservé™ focuses on preserving natural tissue support, building a precise pocket, and keeping scars modest. That approach can make a Motiva-style plan even more stable and can allow smaller implants to go further.
Expect changes in breast volume and skin. A thoughtful plan today—pocket stability, right device, possible lift—usually rides future shifts better and makes any later tune-ups easier.
Most patients walk early and add light lower-body work within a couple of weeks, then progress per clearance. Heavy chest work waits until your surgeon green-lights it.
Yes for silicone implants. Your surgeon will outline MRI or ultrasound timing based on device choice and your history.
Good outcomes start with listening. At StarkMD, we measure, map, and model, then build a plan that respects your tissue, your lifestyle, and your long game. For many patients, that means Motiva paired with subfascial pocketing and Preservé™ tissue-preserving concepts; for others, a firmer, form-stable device makes sense. The through-line is the same: soft-tissue respect, honest sizing, and pockets that stay where we put them.
If you’d like to explore options, bring your photos, your sport, your schedule, and your wishlist. We’ll walk you through probable outcomes, recovery, and how your choices today will look in the years ahead.
Preservé™ messaging used per current guidance: breast enhancement technique designed to preserve natural breast tissue and functionality; less invasive; maintains inner support structures; precise pocket; smaller scars; minimal anesthesia; quick recovery; potential to achieve desired volume with smaller implants.
Philadelphia plastic surgeon Dr. Ran Stark brings decades of experience and training to each consultation. When you meet with Dr. Stark, he takes the time to give you information and options, so you can have confidence in your decision to move forward with the best procedure for you. Confidence. Personalized care. Impeccable results. That’s the Stark Difference. Discover that difference yourself by scheduling a consultation with Dr. Stark today.
135 South Bryn Mawr Ave, Suite 220, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010